Abstract and Introduction
Sources report US Baha'i Review has failed to function according to one or all 1971 Universal House of Justice (UHJ) guidelines requiring (1) prompt review, (2) correct information and (3) dignified presentation. Associated ethical issues surpass the question of possible censorship and include basic questions about justice, integrity and honesty. Why is Baha'i Review becoming a failed policy and process? How should Baha'i Review policy develop to become a useful tool?
